Fine-Tuning
Fine-tuning continues training a pretrained model on examples for a task or domain. It updates model parameters, while prompting and retrieval change the input supplied to a model without training it.
Fine-tuning starts from a pretrained model and adjusts its parameters using additional examples. Hugging Face’s training guide describes this process and walks through preparing a dataset and training a model.
The distinction from prompting and RAG is where the change lives. A prompt or retrieved document supplies information at inference time. Fine-tuning changes the model parameters used to produce the response. These approaches can be combined.
As an engineering starting point, consider fine-tuning when you have a repeated task, suitable training examples, and an evaluation set that can establish whether the change helps. Compare quality, training effort, and serving cost against your existing approach; a smaller specialized model is not automatically cheaper or better once those costs are included.
Fine-tuning can teach domain information as well as behavior. It does not provide a live connection to changing records. If a task depends on the latest customer balance or policy document, supplying current evidence through retrieval is often easier to update and inspect than retraining for every change.
From the conversation
-
How Intercom Cut $250K/Month by Ditching GPT for Qwen -
Thomson 1: The New $40M Legal AI Model | Thomson Reuters Joel Hron -
Most of the Web Will Never Get APIs for AI Agents | Dhruv Batra -
How Superhuman Built AI Into a 100ms Product | Loïc Houssier -
Hallucinations Are a Data Architecture Problem | Sudhir Hasbe, Neo4j