Skip to content

Laurie Voss

Arize

  • 1 episode on Chain of Thought
  • 2 topics covered
  • 1 full transcript
  • Sep 2026 first on the show
Laurie Voss

Laurie Voss is head of developer relations at Arize and co-founded npm. On Chain of Thought he argued that as agents write more code, engineers need to understand user needs and decide what to build.

Cover art for AI Codes: Product Engineers Decide What to Build | Laurie Voss, Arize

Episodes

What the conversations cover

These notes summarize the episodes featuring Laurie Voss, including other speakers in panel conversations. Follow a source link to read the discussion in context.

EP 74 AI Codes: Product Engineers Decide What to Build | Laurie Voss, Arize

  • Laurie Voss, an npm co-founder and head of developer relations at Arize, says the job is shifting from how to build to what to build. Product sense, which used to set senior developers apart, “is becoming absolutely central to the job.” He compares the coming role to the 1960s systems analyst, who translated business requirements into software requirements without writing any software: “That job is coming back, and we’re going to call it a product engineer,” someone who works with a team of agents even without writing code themselves. Episode takeaways
  • Voss says the best AI code-review tools he has seen have about an 80% hit rate, which is “really good, but it’s not enough to put stuff out into production,” so AI-assisted senior review of the last 20% still matters. Agents are weaker still at operations (deploying code, choosing and connecting hardware), refactoring, architecture and scaling, work that depends on tacit information nobody has written down. He expects agents to stay bad at tacit information for the next five years. Episode takeaways
  • Voss says nobody has a great answer yet for people starting out, but he would steer away from code-focused training. Reversing a linked list in Java “is not a thing anyone’s ever going to need to do ever again,” and he’s no longer sure he would advise spending 15 grand on a bootcamp. He would pick a deliberately theoretical computer science course (complexity, big O notation, proving software correct) or one that blends in humanities such as the philosophy of computation and the business of software. Episode takeaways

In their words

I would say the best code review AI tools that I've seen have like an 80% hit rate. And an 80% hit rate is really good, but it's not enough to put stuff out into production, right?

Laurie Voss AI Codes: Product Engineers Decide What to Build | Laurie Voss, Arize · 5:59

It used to be called a systems analyst in like the 60s. That was their job, was translating business requirements into software requirements without writing any software. And that job is coming back, and we're going to call it a product engineer.

Laurie Voss AI Codes: Product Engineers Decide What to Build | Laurie Voss, Arize · 32:32

Transcript excerpts; ellipses mark omitted words. Some automatically selected quotes have filler words removed.